<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>uninteresting :: rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uninteresting.org/rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich</link>
	<description>provided by the management for your protection</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>NYTImes: interactive video &#038; transcript of the VP debate</title>
		<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/10/03/nytimes-interactive-video-transcript-of-the-vp-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/10/03/nytimes-interactive-video-transcript-of-the-vp-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media, news, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/10/03/nytimes-interactive-video-transcript-of-the-vp-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYTImes: interactive video &#38; transcript of the VP debate / FactChecking Biden-Palin Debate
so Palin didn&#8217;t crash and burn, mostly because she was reading/regurgitating canned statements. she wins on style, but Biden wins on substance. it was truly a case of Republican&#8217;s putting &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; - and if you have half a brain you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/debates/vice-presidential-debate.html">NYTImes: interactive video &amp; transcript of the VP debate</a> / <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_biden-palin_debate.html">FactChecking Biden-Palin Debate</a></p>
<p>so Palin didn&#8217;t crash and burn, mostly because she was reading/regurgitating canned statements. she wins on style, but Biden wins on substance. it was truly a case of Republican&#8217;s putting &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; - and if you have half a brain you know who&#8217;s the lipstick and who&#8217;s the pig.</p>
<blockquote><p>
  On at least 10 occasions, Palin gave answers that were nonspecific, completely generic, pivoted away from the question at hand, or simply ignored it: on global warming, an Iraq exit strategy, Iran and Pakistan, Iranian diplomacy, Israel-Palestine (and a follow-up), the nuclear trigger, interventionism, Cheney&#8217;s vice presidency and her own greatest weakness. [<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14235.html">Palin clears bar, still falls short</a>]
</p></blockquote>
<p>in the end, people tuned in to see a trainwreck that didn&#8217;t happen. there probably won&#8217;t be much effect on the polls, though it seems Biden is ahead:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>As with the Obama-McCain debate last Friday, the vast majority of the insta-polls went to the Democratic ticket. Biden won the CBS poll of undecideds 46-21, and the CNN poll of debate watchers 51-36. Independents in the large MediaCurves focus group panel went for Biden about 2:1. [<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/post-vp-debate-thoughts.html">Post-VP Debate Thoughts]</a></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/10/03/nytimes-interactive-video-transcript-of-the-vp-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 years of Bush</title>
		<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/8-years-of-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/8-years-of-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media, news, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/8-years-of-bush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[personally, i am much better off than i was 8 years ago. but Bush ain&#8217;t helpin&#8230;
The Bush Economy:

January 19, 2001: 10,587.59
  September 29, 2008: 10,365.45
NASDAQ Jan 19, 2001 = 2770.38
  NASDAQ September 29, 2008 = 1983.73
CPI, January 19, 2001: 175
  CPI, September 29, 2008: 219
Dollar exchange with Euro, January 19, 2001: 1.068
 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, i <em>am</em> much better off than i was 8 years ago. but Bush ain&#8217;t helpin&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="color: #555555; font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-bush-economy/">The Bush Economy</a>:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p>January 19, 2001: 10,587.59<br />
  September 29, 2008: 10,365.45</p>
<p>NASDAQ Jan 19, 2001 = 2770.38<br />
  NASDAQ September 29, 2008 = 1983.73</p>
<p>CPI, January 19, 2001: 175<br />
  CPI, September 29, 2008: 219</p>
<p>Dollar exchange with Euro, January 19, 2001: 1.068<br />
  Dollar exchange with Euro, September 29, 2008: .695</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/8-years-of-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>black monday part deux</title>
		<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/black-monday-part-deux/</link>
		<comments>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/black-monday-part-deux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media, news, society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[personal things]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/black-monday-part-deux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
so the $700B bailout plan was rejected today and the street flipped out. the Dow closed 777 points down, and the leader unfortunately was AAPL (down 17.4% to 105.90). i&#8217;m heavily invested in Apple through work and even with my own money, but i have to say, i&#8217;m really not that worried about it. here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://uninteresting.org/rich/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/200809291915.jpg" width="800" height="372" alt="200809291915.jpg" style="border:1px #000000 solid;" /></p>
<p>so the $700B bailout plan was rejected today and the street flipped out. the Dow closed 777 points down, and the leader unfortunately was AAPL (down 17.4% to 105.90). i&#8217;m heavily invested in Apple through work and even with my own money, but i have to say, i&#8217;m really not that worried about it. here&#8217;s a few reasons why:</p>
<p>1. i&#8217;m glad the bailout plan failed. one thing i&#8217;ve learned is that when Bush is on the telly urging America to act quickly to save ourselves from disaster, then our response should be to move <em>slowly</em> and with deliberation. [Jon Stewart: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/26/jon-stewart-bush-bailout_n_129588.html">Bush Bailout Speech Just Like Iraq Speech</a>]</p>
<p>2. i&#8217;m long on AAPL. i&#8217;d buy more now if i had the money. today&#8217;s price drop was caused by analysts revising their estimates and basically saying that Apple would be affected by the consumer slowdown (surprise!). the slowdown affects everyone (like say, Apple&#8217;s competition), so i see the macro-environment as increasing the opportunity for Apple to extend it&#8217;s lead in various efforts. we&#8217;ve got $20B of cash reserves in the bank, and investors have been questioning why Apple doesn&#8217;t go out and make some big acquisitions. well, <em>this</em> is why. i&#8217;m hoping the price will stay low through december, when we make our bi-annual ESPP purchases.</p>
<p>3. i&#8217;ve got 28 years until i&#8217;m 65. this is a big dip, thanks to shitty republican leadership, but over the long-haul it will smooth over.</p>
<p></p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
  <img src="http://uninteresting.org/rich/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/200809291930.jpg" width="619" height="378" alt="200809291930.jpg" />
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/black-monday-part-deux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>fact checking the debates</title>
		<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/fact-checking-the-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/fact-checking-the-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media, news, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/fact-checking-the-debates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[factcheck.org: FactChecking Debate No. 1
the debates should be like trials, where evidence is submitted ahead of time. each candidate submits the facts they plan to use for their arguments, and they are independently verified and approved ahead of time. only then can they be referred to in the debate.
they spent too much time arguing over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_1.html">factcheck.org: FactChecking Debate No. 1</a></p>
<p>the debates should be like trials, where evidence is submitted ahead of time. each candidate submits the facts they plan to use for their arguments, and they are independently verified and approved ahead of time. only then can they be referred to in the debate.</p>
<p>they spent too much time arguing over who said what and what it meant (e.g. what Kissinger said about talking to Iran without preconditions). it&#8217;s a complete waste of time to see them arguing over who&#8217;s telling them truth.</p>
<p>for what it&#8217;s worth, the Kissinger back &amp; forth was comletely caused by McCain twisting Obama&#8217;s words.&nbsp;Kissinger&nbsp;did say that we should meet w/o preconditions (but not at the presidential level). McCain kept insisting that Obama meant presidential meetings.</p>
<p> [<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2201130/">Disregarding Henry</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/29/fact-checking-the-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Initial Polls Show Obama Winning The Debate</title>
		<link>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/27/initial-polls-show-obama-winning-the-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/27/initial-polls-show-obama-winning-the-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media, news, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/27/initial-polls-show-obama-winning-the-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My take, in a nutshell: it was

Intelligence vs. faith
Logic vs. emotion
Collaboration vs. isolation

CNN polls:

Regardless of which candidate you happen to support, who do you think did the best job in the debate — Barack Obama or John McCain?
  Obama 51%
  McCain 38%
Did _______ do a better or worse job than you expected?
  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take, in a nutshell: it was</p>
<ul>
<li>Intelligence vs. faith</li>
<li>Logic vs. emotion</li>
<li>Collaboration vs. isolation</li>
</ul>
<p>CNN polls:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/initial_polls_show_obama_winni.php">
<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>Regardless of which candidate you happen to support, who do you think did the best job in the debate — Barack Obama or John McCain?</b><br />
  Obama 51%<br />
  McCain 38%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>Did _______ do a better or worse job than you expected?</b><br />
  Obama: Better 57%, Worse 20%, Same 23%<br />
  McCain: Better 60%, Worse 20%, Same 18%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>Next, regardless of which presidential candidate you support, please tell me if you think Barack Obama or John McCain would better handle each of the following issues:</b></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> The war in Iraq: Obama 52%, McCain 47%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Terrorism: McCain 49%, Obama 45%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> The economy: Obama 58%, McCain 37%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> The current financial crisis: Obama 54%, McCain 36%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>Thinking about the following characteristics and qualities, please say whether you think each one better described Barack Obama or John McCain during tonight’s debate:</b></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Was more intelligent: Obama 55%, McCain 30%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Expressed his views more clearly: Obama 53%, McCain 36%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Spent more time attacking his opponent: McCain 60%, Obama 23%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Was more sincere and authentic: Obama 46%, McCain 38%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Seemed to be the stronger leader: Obama 49%, McCain 43%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Was more likeable: Obama 61%, McCain 26%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>•</b> Was more in touch with the needs and problems of people like you: Obama 62%, McCain 32%</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><b>Based on what _______ said and did in tonight’s debate, do you think he would be able to handle the job of president if he is elected?</b><br />
  Obama 69%-29%<br />
  McCain 68%-30%</span></p>
<p>[From <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/initial_polls_show_obama_winni.php"><cite>TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | Initial Polls Show Obama Winning The Debate</cite></a>]
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uninteresting.org/rich/2008/09/27/initial-polls-show-obama-winning-the-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.818 seconds -->
