why a lame Macworld makes sense
today was Apple’s last keynote speech at Macworld (it’s withdrawing from the conference). Phil Schiller, head of marketing, did the presentation (here’s the video). there were 3 announcements:
- iLife ‘09
- iWork ‘09
- the 17″ Macbook Pro
nothing earth shattering, and the media is all over that fact. here’s why it makes sense, though:
- the whole reason for divorcing itself from Macworld is to eliminate unrealistic expectations and an arbitrary deadline for launching products. why wasn’t there a new Mac Mini or iPhone Nano? because, if such products are in the pipeline, they’re not ready. yet people are disappointed because Macworld happens every January and they expect something like a new iPhone every time.
how about this instead: when products are ready, a small event is held and it’s available immediately.
- the financial markets are a wreck and the country is in a recession. is now the time to launch a hot new device? no. is now the time to buckle down and refine products in development in the labs, for launch when the turnaround happens? yes.
steve jobs on managing through the economic downturn:
“We’ve had one of these before, when the dot-com bubble burst. What I told our company was that we were just going to invest our way through the downturn, that we weren’t going to lay off people, that we’d taken a tremendous amount of effort to get them into Apple in the first place — the last thing we were going to do is lay them off. And we were going to keep funding. In fact we were going to up our R&D budget so that we would be ahead of our competitors when the downturn was over. And that’s exactly what we did. And it worked. And that’s exactly what we’ll do this time.”


